Minutes
Philadelphia Yearly Meeting Indian Committee
September 22, 2001

Present: Louis Lafevre, Marie Haaf, Carrie Goodman, Nancy Webster, Lois Kuter, Sam Lemon, Melissa Elliott, Carol Ann Gray

Regrets: Julie Kiene, Anne Humes

1. Meeting opened with silent worship.

2. Minutes were approved, with changes to meeting dates. Scheduled Indian Committee meetings for 2001-2002 are Sept. 22, Oct. 27, Nov. 17, and Dec. 8 of 2001; and Jan. 12, Feb. 9, Mar. 9, April 13, May 11, and June 8 of 2002.

3. Lois Kuter gave the treasurer’s report, indicating that there is $6,216.06 remaining to be used before the end of December 2001. She also delivered a year-end wrap-up for 2000-2001.

4. Sam Lemon, clerk, gave the committee updates on two grant requests: · No more information has been received on the Piney Lenape request. · The FCNL grant that we approved in June has been paid.

5. The Indian Committee approved the request from the MOWA Choctaw Friends Academy for a grant of $2,030 to be used for furniture and equipment for the school’s kindergarten and first grade classes.

6. Sam visited Keenan Shenandoah at Delaware Valley Friends School. This seems to be a good fit for Keenan’s needs, and he is now established there.

7. This year, the Indian Committee will consider requests at alternate meetings, leaving the remaining meetings as time to talk about policy issues. Grants will be considered at the following meetings: October, December, February, April, and June.

8. The nominating committee gave its report. Lois Kuter will be clerk, Carol Ann Gray will be alternate clerk, and Louis Lefevre will be treasurer, The Committee is seeking a recording secretary. Carol Ann  Gray will work with the clerk to write the annual report, and Carrie Goodman and Sam Lemon will collaborate on web site development. These names were approved.

9. Regarding the request by Jill Kinney, a graduate student in history at the University of Rochester, Sam Lemon will write to her to get more information. Questions raised: Is she asking for money to copy the tape? How much would it cost? How wi ll she use it? Would we be given a copy of her dissertation, when completed? Where is the original copy archived?

10. The committee discussed buying a laptop computer for writing minutes during meetings, keeping minutes in one place for archiving and easy referral, keeping mailing lists, formatting business cards and application blanks for grants. Carol Ann will check into prices for new and used models.

11. Carrie and Sam will move ahead with establishing the Indian Committee’s website, looking for a consultant.

12. There was a discussion of what should be sent to the Quaker Collection at Haverford College.

13. At our next meeting, we will do some brainstorming about recruitment of new members.

14. Sam listed some policy issues we should address: scope of PYMIC grants, guidelines for scholarship requests; whether we want to set geographic boundaries on grant requests; networking with other Indian committees or groups; outreach to Indian tribes and organizations in the tri-state region; questions regarding international relations; approval of Burlington conference report.

15. The committee approved the idea of assigning a committee member to track each grant that is approved and get a follow-up report.

16. There was a brief discussion about the issue of setting geographic boundaries for our grant requests. These are some of the comments: What as the intention of those who left the bequests that provide the money we use? Needs are vast, and our funds are modest in comparison. Requests
by Quaker organizations for projects that would involve U.S. groups across borders might be one acceptable form for grants made for international concerns. We could also choose to emphasize subject areas or local or national concerns. How do we want to set limits on scholarships, or do we want to discontinue considering them? We would like more voices present for this discussion and will continue it at the next available time.

17. The Committee discussed the need to find a more efficient and tactful way to assist Members with any expenses they may incur in completing work for the Committee. We were reminded that Committee
Members had very different levels of financial wealth or lack of wealth and that we needed to be sensitive to this. It was proposed that we set up a mechanism for members to request reimbursement directly from the Clerk without bringing needs to the full committee. Treasurer's Reports would not include specific names to whom we reimburse small expenses,  but would track our spending for "volunteer expenses" so we can budget realistically to meet needs of members. This will be discussed further at the October 27 meeting.

18. The Committee began discussion of policy issues related to our funding priorities, budgeting, and operation, but deferred in-depth discussion to the October meeting.

19. The Committee adjourned the meeting at approximately 12:15 with a period of silent worship.

Respectfully submitted,
Melissa Elliott

10/18/01